Live demo
Watch the feedback loop — no signup.
What does “detailed feedback” actually look like? This shows you: a real prompt, a real student response, and the structured feedback the platform produces — strengths, weak spots, and a concrete next step.
Step 1 — the prompt
Evaluate the argument
P1. Every swan I have observed has been white.
P2. Therefore, all swans are white.
Is this argument deductively valid? Sound? If neither, characterize what kind of inference it is and what its weakest link is.
Step 2 — a sample student answer
The argument is not deductively valid because the conclusion goes beyond the evidence — the premises don't strictly entail the conclusion. It's an inductive generalization from a sample. The weakest link is the jump from "swans I have seen" to "all swans," since the sample may not be representative: I might live in a region with only white swans.
Step 3 — detailed feedback
Rigorous Reasoning evaluates the response against a deterministic rubric, then turns the verdict into pedagogically grounded plain English.
Want this on every response you write?
Start free. No credit card required.
Create free account