Rigorous Reasoning
← Reasoning Lab

Inductive Reasoning · Free

Induction Strength Checker

Score the structural strength of an inductive generalization or analogical argument on four objective criteria. The tool sums the criterion scores into a 0–12 total, maps to a band (Strong / Moderate / Weak / Very Weak), identifies the weakest criterion, and offers a concrete suggestion for where to focus repair. The score evaluates the form of the argument, not the truth of its conclusion — that distinction is the most important thing this tool teaches.

Used in: Inductive Logic. The full unit covers what makes a sample representative, why surface similarities don't carry analogical weight, and how sweeping conclusions overreach the evidence that supports them.
Argument type

How many cases is the generalization based on?

How varied is the sample across relevant subgroups?

How was the sample gathered? Self-selected and convenience samples carry systematic distortion.

How sweeping is the conclusion you're drawing? Stronger claims need stronger evidence.

Inductive arguments aim for probability, not certainty. Evaluating their structural strength is part of evaluating the argument well — but only part. The other parts (whether the premises are accurate, whether the inference is appropriate to the domain) are tasks for substantive judgment, not structural scoring.