Loading…
Loading…
Fallacies And Errors·Rigorous·5 lessons·~340 min
From fundamental inferential failures to specific species across modes of reasoning
What you'll learn
Lessons
Introduces a structural taxonomy of fallacies by fundamental inferential defect rather than by disconnected labels, and establishes the diagnosis-and-repair routine used throughout the unit.
Examines fallacies driven by formal structure, quantifier scope, class reasoning, and invalid deductive patterns, and shows why these errors demand structural rather than evidential repair.
Shows how support miscalibration and option-space failure produce different species across evidence-based reasoning, and why good diagnosis has to track the mode of inference.
Extends the taxonomy to probabilistic updating and practical strategy selection, showing how base-rate neglect and option-space failure behave across both domains.
An integrative lesson that asks students to run the full diagnostic cycle on arguments drawn from the wild: name the fallacy, explain the mechanism of failure, and propose a repair or a steelman when one is available.
How to study
Each lesson opens with a guided walkthrough — read it before the activity.
Look at why each step follows, not just what the answer is.
Know which rule applies and what would make the response weak before you start.
Optional context for the unit. Each lesson surfaces the concepts and rules it uses — these are here when you want the bigger picture.
A broad family of inferential failure that can generate several more specific named fallacies.
A more specific recurring error pattern that instantiates a broader fundamental inferential defect.
A family of errors in which the offered consideration does not bear on the conclusion in the required way.
A family of errors in which the degree or type of support claimed is stronger, weaker, or otherwise different from what the evidence actually warrants.
A family of errors caused by misreading logical form, quantifier scope, class structure, or formal relation.
A family of errors in which relevant alternatives, constraints, or strategy revisions are ignored.
The practice of pairing any fallacy identification with a description of what change would make the reasoning acceptable.